| dc.contributor.author | Gheltofan, Daniela | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-15T08:02:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-15T08:02:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Daniela, Gheltofan. Paremiological antonymy in Romanian and Russian: Theoretical and practical considerations. Timișoara: Politehnica University Press, 2015. Disponibil la: https://doi.org/10.59168/CLPC7256 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://sc.upt.ro/ro/publicatii/pcts/issues-pcts?start=10 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://search.crossref.org/search/works?q=10.59168%2FCLPC7256&from_ui=yes Link DOI | |
| dc.description.abstract | A proverb involves a set of operations that make it a linguistic and a cognitive, ontological, cultural and pragmatic phenomenon. In a discourse, proverbs and sayings function as verbal stereotypes: they are “ready-made” discourse units that reproduce, depending on the emitter’s intention and on the link with the message communicated. There are antonymic structures at paremiological level; thus, we identified different implicit and explicit proverbial contrasting structures that we gathered under the label “paremiological antonyms” (PrmA); we then distinguished two main types of PrmA: inter-paremiological antonyms and intra-paremiological antonyms. We exemplified on a Russian and Romanian corpus. PrmA are the most vivid example of the (co)existence of antonyms proper and occasional at phrase, contextual level. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Universitatea Politehnica Timișoara | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Professional Communication And Translation Studies;8 / 2015 | |
| dc.subject | Paremiological antonymy | en_US |
| dc.subject | Inter-paremiological antonyms | en_US |
| dc.subject | Contrasting paremiological meaning | en_US |
| dc.subject | Intra-paremiological antonyms | |
| dc.title | Paremiological antonymy in Romanian and Russian: Theoretical and practical considerations [articol] | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |