This work aims to investigate on a meta-theoretical level the conceptual framework of
rhetoric. Two spheres can be distinguished: the argumentative or persuasive rhetoric and the
non-argumentative or non-persuasive rhetoric. Tracing the contemporary theoretical trends in
the rhetoric field, we propose an alternative version of conceptualization. Using both the feminist
invitational rhetoric and the comparative rhetoric, we propose an integrative synthesis. The
alternative is found in the Buddhists texts and practices. Among the non-argumentative aspects
of language we mention: negation, contradiction, silence, the story or the paradox. We believe
that these elements of our daily life are worth emphasized and encompassed in an integrative
perspective. It is possible not to evaluate.
This work aims to investigate on a meta-theoretical level the conceptual framework of rhetoric. Two spheres can be distinguished: the argumentative or persuasive rhetoric and the non-argumentative or non-persuasive rhetoric. ...
In the digital age, the great development of the media means of communication require a method of analysis for the new technologies. Through a metatheoretical analysis we evaluate, from a methodological point of view, the ...
Băiaș, Cosmin-Constantin(Timişoara: Editura Politehnica, 2020)
The field of the communication sciences is a hybrid field with various influences that can be observed in the research methods that are used: the quantitative-scientific and qualitative-interpretive methods. Rhetorical ...
